Oldham Children's Fund
The main impacts achieved across the Children’s Fund and On Track programme
The
main impacts that were found to be achieved across the Children’s Fund and On Track programme are described
below:
- The research found that impacts across the programme were
generally positive.
- Participation in the Children’s Fund and On Track programme was
found to reduce children’s, parents’ and families exposure to key risk factors and involvement in the
interventions was found to assist in building resilience.
- Impacts on parents were
greater (more significant) and more widespread than the impacts on children, in that more statistically
significant impacts were evident for the parents’ interventions and more widespread impacts were achieved
across the Every Child Matters outcome areas.
- Differences in impacts between interventions
were evident and the most significant impacts were intervention specific – the programme contained a
mix of high and low impacting provision.
- Few of the statistically significant impacts
evident within any single intervention were common across the programme, possibly due to the differing
aims of the interventions across the Children’s Fund and On Track programme.
- The
site of provision may have affected impacts. Where there was no statistical relationship
between sites and impacts, there could be an opportunity to share skills between providers working across
different sites.
- Short term interventions had impacts that were equal to, or greater
than those achieved by longer term interventions. For example a short-term intervention such as ‘Tell
it like it is’ was found to have the same number of impacts under the Every Child Matters sub-outcomes
as a longer term intervention such as Child Dinosaur.
- The extent to which impacts
might be sustained needs to be addressed, especially for short term interventions where the recorded
impacts may not be sustained over the longer term and the ‘distance’ between the intervention and the
point of measure was shorter than in other cases.
- The accumulation of impact was
not captured in the methodology, but evidence from parent interventions could suggest a cumulative impact,
in that there was evidence of clear progression between the parents’ interventions of Survival Skills,
STEPS and Parents’ Academy.
- The focus of an intervention – clear aims and structured
approach – could enhance impacts, specifically in relation to work with parents.
- The
impacts under ECM outcome areas varied, with fewer impacts reported under outcome areas such as ‘achieve
economic well-being’ and more reported under ‘make a positive contribution’.
- There
was greater variation under ECM sub-outcomes than anticipated – all interventions were found to impact
on ‘mentally and emotionally healthy’ (Be Healthy), and none of the interventions were found to impact
on ‘sexually healthy’.
- Overall the research found that children and parents, within
some interventions, were experiencing greater positive impacts than those in other interventions – but
all were gaining some benefit.