“Pupils with SEN should have the same opportunities as others to progress and demonstrate achievement.“
(DfEE1997b:1.24)
Teachers must challenge low expectations and differentiate the curriculum to meet a diversity of needs.
The SEN Code of Practice (DfES 2001b) sees increased curriculum differentiation taking place within the pupils’ normal classroom work; a component of Quality First Teaching
All newly qualified teachers will be able to differentiate teaching practice appropriately.
(OFSTED 1999b: para. 30)
Differentiation matches what is taught and how it is taught to individual pupil’s needs and learning styles
Differentiation is synonymous with inclusion and good teaching. It builds on pupils’ past achievement and provides challenge for further achievement and opportunities for successful learning.
Differentiation is about intervening to maximise pupil potential, and to ensure curriculum access and entitlement.
Inclusion is a process that develops ways of increasing the participation and learning of all pupils and minimises barriers to their learning and participation.
The new school inspection framework introduced in January 2000 places greater emphasis on educational inclusion. It focuses on the impact of teaching on pupils’ learning, how well pupils make progress, and the extent to which teachers use methods that enable pupils of all abilities to learn effectively. The teacher…
“plans effectively to ensure that pupils have the opportunity to meet their potential, not withstanding differences of race and gender, taking account of the needs of pupils who are underachieving, very able, not yet fluent in English.”
(NQT Induction Standards; DfES 2001d: Annex A: 2b)
For all key stages, Curriculum 2000 stipulates three essential principles to developing a more inclusive curriculum;
“They differentiate their teaching to meet the needs of pupils, including the more able and those with special educational needs.”
(QTS Standards; DfES 2002:3.3.4)
March 2000 saw the launch of the Index for Inclusion (CSIE 2000), originally designed exclusively for use with SEN pupils in mainstream schools. It covers disabled children and ethnic minorities as well as SEN. Developed by the CSIE, Manchester University and Canterbury Christ Church University College, the key purpose of the Index for Inclusion is to encourage mainstream schools to value all pupils equally and celebrate diversity in an inclusive culture. The Index helps schools to identify inequality and barriers to learning, and tackle discrimination. It focuses on three dimensions of school life: A, Creating Inclusive Cultures; B, Producing Inclusive Policies; and C, Evolving Inclusive Practices. Each dimension is divided into two sections. Each section contains up to 12 indicators that are clarified by a series of questions.
Following is an example of the indicators within dimension C:
Indicators:
C.1.1.Lessons are responsive to student diversity
C.1.2.Lessons are made accessible to all students.
C.1.3 Lessons develop an understanding of difference.
C.1.4 Students are actively involved in their own learning.
C.1.5 Students learn collaboratively.
C.1.6 Assessment encourages the achievements of all students.
C.1.7 Classroom discipline is based on mutual respect.
C.1.8 Teachers plan, review and teach in partnership.
C.1.9 Teachers are concerned to support the learning and participation of all students.
C.1.10 Learning support assistants are concerned to support the learning and participation of all students.
C.1.11 Homework contributes to the learning of all.
C.1.12 All students take part in activities outside the classroom.
(CSIE 2000: 48)
The indicators in dimension C1.1 of the Index for Inclusion provide class / subject teachers with a valuable audit tool with which to reflect upon their teaching style and curriculum delivery.
Although children learn in different ways they are likely to learn more effectively when using their preferred learning style. Teachers therefore need to use a variety of teaching approaches that cover multi-sensory learning styles.
Three popular learning styles
Ask some of your colleagues how they differentiate, and the most common response is ‘by outcome’. However, there are several other methods of differentiation that you can use.
All teachers, including ITT students on teaching practice, should reflect on their classroom teaching regularly, in order to evaluate if the methods employed are appropriate, and if a greater repertoire of teaching styles could be adopted, in order to meet a greater diversity of pupils’ needs more effectively. NQTs and ITT students have the advantage of being observed by other more experienced teachers during their training and Induction year. This experience is valuable in obtaining practical advice about teaching methodology. In addition, observing other colleagues teaching can also provide further ideas for increasing your range of teaching approaches.
Below, is a list of some of the different teaching strategies you can use. It is always good practice to use a variety of teaching methods in any lesson, particularly when your class contains pupils with short attention spans, poor concentration levels, and little motivation to learn.
“What children with special needs so often require is not something radically different from other children … but simply what all children need: a better and more vigorous curriculum pursued through a more varied and enlightened pedagogy.”
(Bell and Best 1986: 102)
| Demonstration, modelling, example | Comprehension tasks: oral and written |
| Audiovisual presentations | Worksheets and handouts |
| Investigation and pupil research | Role play and hot seating |
| Visiting speakers | ICT |
| Experiment and hypothesising | Brainstorming |
| Educational visits | Pupils planning and choosing activities |
| Case study | Testing pupils |
| Whole-class reading | Skill practice |
| Practical tasks | Revision: teacher instruction |
| Board work | Team teaching |
| Discussion/debate | Interviewing |
| Use of library | Independent work |
| Questioning: open and closed | Pupil pair or group work |
| Using real artefacts and concrete examples | Reporting back to the whole class |
| Explanation by teacher or pupils | Note-taking |
| Problem-solving | Textbook based tasks |